Overview
CHI 2024 anticipates more than 3,000 Papers submissions. The review process needs to handle this load while also providing high-quality reviews, which requires that each submission is handled by an expert Associate Chair (AC) who can recruit expert reviewers. The organization of the CHI program committee into topical subcommittees helps achieve this. See the description of the Papers review process for a detailed explanation of the responsibilities of the ACs and Subcommittee Chairs (SCs).
Authors should examine what constitutes a contribution to CHI and recognize that there are many different types of contribution possible for a CHI paper.
Notes on Composition of Subcommittees
Once abstracts are submitted, individual subcommittees may grow or shrink based on the number of probable papers for that subcommittee. As in previous years, the paper chairs will be undertaking a survey to detail the diversity for each subcommittee. Please see, for example, this blog post on Diversity of the Program Committee for CHI 2020 which was published in July 2019.
Authors are required to suggest a subcommittee to review your submission. This page provides guidance on choosing the appropriate subcommittees for your submission.
Subcommittee Selection Process
When you submit a Paper, you can designate up to two appropriate subcommittees for your submission and we recommend that you indicate two. In the vast majority of cases, the subcommittee that will review your submission is one of the two subcommittees that you proposed. In cases where the Papers Chairs and/or Subcommittee Chairs recognize that your submission will be reviewed more thoroughly in another subcommittee, a submission may be transferred from one subcommittee to another. If a submission is transferred to another subcommittee, this will happen in the first week of the process, before reviewers are assigned; i.e., transferring will not affect a submission’s review process, it will only ensure that it receives the most complete, fair set of reviews.
Below, you will see a list of subcommittees and descriptions of the topics they are covering, the name of each SC, and the names of the ACs serving on each subcommittee. It is your responsibility to select the subcommittee that best matches the expertise needed to assess your research and that you believe will most fully appreciate your contribution to the field of HCI.
CHI has traditionally supported diverse and interdisciplinary work and continues to expand into new topics not previously explored. We recognize that as a result, you may find more than two subcommittees which are plausible matches for your work. However, for a number of reasons, it will be necessary for you to select no more than two target subcommittees, and you should strive to find the best matches based on what you think is the main contribution of your submission (examples of papers that are considered good matches are linked below for each subcommittee). You can also email the SCs for guidance if you are unsure (an email alias is provided below for each set of SCs).
Note that the scope of each subcommittee is not rigidly defined. Each has a broad mandate, and most subcommittees cover a collection of different topics. Further, SCs and ACs are all seasoned researchers, experienced with program committee review work, and each is committed to a process which seeks to assign each paper reviewers who are true experts in whatever the subject matter of the paper is. ACs recognize that many papers, or perhaps even most papers, will not perfectly fit the definition of their subcommittee’s scope. Consequently, papers will not be penalized or downgraded because they do not align perfectly with a particular subcommittee. Interdisciplinary, multi-topic, and cross-topic papers are encouraged and will be carefully and professionally judged by all subcommittees.
In making a subcommittee choice you should make careful consideration of what the most central and salient contribution of your work is, even if there are several different contributions. As an example, let’s say you are writing a paper about Ergonomic Business Practices for the Elderly using Novel Input Devices. Perhaps this is a very new topic. It covers a lot of ground. It’s not an exact fit for any of the subcommittees, but several choices are plausible. To choose between them, you need to make a reasoned decision about the core contributions of your work. Should it be evaluated in terms of the usage context for the target user community? The novel methodology developed for your study? The system and interaction techniques you have developed? Each of these evaluation criteria may partially apply, but try to consider which is most central and which you most want to highlight for your readers. Also look at the subcommittees, the people who will serve on them, and the kind of work they have been associated with in the past. Even if there are several subcommittees that could offer fair and expert assessments of this work, go with the one that really fits the most important and novel contributions of your paper. That committee will be in the best position to offer constructive and expert review feedback on the contributions of your research.
Each subcommittee description also links to several recent CHI papers that the SCs feel are good examples of papers that fit the scope of that subcommittee. Please look at these examples as a way to decide on the best subcommittee for your paper – but remember that these are just a few examples, and do not specify the full range of topics that would fit with any subcommittee.
List of the Subcommittees
Find a list of all subcommittees below.
Accessibility and Aging
This subcommittee is suitable for contributions related to the design or study of technology for people with disabilities and/or older adults. Accessibility papers are those that deal with technology designed for or used by people with disabilities including sensory, motor, mobility, psychosocial or cognitive, intellectual or learning disabilities, or people who identify as neurodivergent. Aging papers are broadly categorized as those dealing with technology designed for or used by people in the later stages of life. Relationships with technology are complex and multifaceted; we welcome contributions across a range of topics aimed at benefiting relevant stakeholder groups and not solely limited to concerns of making technology accessible. Note that if your paper primarily concerns health outcomes or interactions with health data or with healthcare providers, then the Health subcommittee is probably a better fit, whereas papers reflecting on how technologies are used or designed for specific needs are a better fit for this subcommittee. Submissions to this subcommittee will be evaluated, in part, based on how they include and potentially target user groups and other stakeholders. This subcommittee balances the rigor required in all CHI submissions with awareness of the challenges of conducting research in these important areas. This subcommittee welcomes all contributions related to accessibility and aging, including empirical, theoretical, conceptual, methodological, design, and systems contributions.
Strong submissions to this subcommittee will engage, as appropriate, with ongoing dialogues around ethical research praxis regarding representation of people from minoritized populations in the work. For example, papers that rely on data from non-disabled people should consider discussions around so-called “simulation studies” and how to avoid pitfalls of these methods. Your paper should also use inclusive language. Avoid characterizing an entire population using phrases that represent outlier positions for individuals, like “suffering from” (negative) or “inspirational” (positive). When comparing across characteristics or experiences, avoid referring to some people as “normal” implying others are not, or broadly characterizing one group’s experiences as categorically better or worse than others. We also recommend avoiding terms like “vulnerable,” “special needs,” and “X challenged.” We understand there may be exceptions (e.g., medical vision classification systems define a visual acuity as “normal”), but such usage should be footnoted for clarity, and these measures should be relevant to the described work. We expect that authors will review the language in their papers before each submission (initial submission, camera ready), and AC’s, SC’s, and other organizing committee members may request changes to language deemed to be non-inclusive as a condition of acceptance.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Kristen Shinohara, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
- Mingming Fan, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China
- Stacy Branham, University of California, USA
- Robin Brewer, University of Michigan, USA
Associate Chairs
- Dragan Ahmetovic, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
- Giulia Barbareschi, Keio University, Japan
- Erin Brady, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, USA
- Danielle Bragg, Microsoft Research, USA
- Erin Buehler, Google, USA
- Patrick Carrington, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Michael Crabb, University of Dundee, UK
- Jiamin (Carrie) Dai, University of British Columbia, Canada
- Shital Desai, York University, Canada
- Yao Du, University of Southern California, USA
- Yasmine N. Elglaly, Western Washington University, USA
- Lizbeth Escobedo, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Vinitha Gadiraju, Wellesley, USA
- Abraham Glasser, Gallaudet University, USA
- Jiangtao Gong, Tsinghua University, China
- Yasamin Heshmat, Unity Technologies, USA
- Jazette Johnson, University of Michigan, USA
- Hernisa Kacorri, University of Maryland, USA
- Lynn Kirabo, Harvey Mudd College, USA
- Sri Kurniawan, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
- Sooyeon Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA
- Aqueasha Martin-Hammond, Indiana University – Indianapolis, USA
- Oussama Metatla, University of Bristol, UK
- Franklin Mingzhe Li, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Cosmin Munteanu, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Hugo Nicolau, University of Lisbon, Portugal
- Carolyn Pang, Oracle Corporation, USA
- Fabio Paternò, CNR-ISTI, HIIS Laboratory, Italy
- Vânia Paula de Almeida Neris, Federal University of Sao Carlos – UFSCar, Brazil
- Roshan Peiris, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
- André Filipe Pereira Rodrigues, University of Lisbon, Portugal
- Helen Petrie, University of York, UK
- Abi Roper, City University of London, UK
- Sayan Sarcar, Birmingham City University, UK
- Frank Steinicke, Universität Hamburg, Germany
- John Tang, Microsoft Research, USA
- Garreth Tigwell, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
- Khai Truong, University of Toronto, Canada
- Astrid Weber, Google, USA
- Zikai Wen, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China
- Zeynep Yildiz, Koç University, Turkey
- Yuhang Zhao, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
- Annuska Zolyomi, University of Washington Bothell, USA
Contact: access@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the “Other”
- Screen Recognition: Creating Accessibility Metadata for Mobile Applications from Pixels
- Technology Adoption and Learning Preferences for Older Adults:: Evolving Perceptions, Ongoing Challenges, and Emerging Design Opportunities
- Making as Expression: Informing Design with People with Complex Communication Needs through Art Therapy
- SayWAT: Augmenting Face-to-Face Conversations for Adults with Autism
- Addressing Age-Related Bias in Sentiment Analysis
- Smart Touch: Improving Touch Accuracy for People with Motor Impairments with Template Matching
- Methods for Evaluation of Imperfect Captioning Tools by Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Users at Different Reading Literacy Levels
- People with Visual Impairment Training Personal Object Recognizers: Feasibility and Challenges
- Caption Crawler: Enabling Reusable Alternative Text Descriptions using Reverse Image Search
- Older Adults Learning Computer Programming: Motivations, Frustrations, and Design Opportunities
- The Design of Assistive Location-based Technologies for People with Ambulatory Disabilities: A Formative Study
- “If It’s Important It Will Be A Headline”: Cybersecurity Information Seeking in Older Adults
- Older People Inventing their Personal Internet of Things with the IoT Un-Kit Experience
- Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention
- Understanding Older Users’ Acceptance of Wearable Interfaces for Sensor-based Fall Risk Assessment
- Understanding Older Adults’ Participation in Design Workshops
Blending Interaction: Engineering Interactive Systems & Tools
This subcommittee focuses on the development of novel interactive systems and “enabling” contributions, which are resources that facilitate the development of future interactive systems and inspire future interface design explorations. Interactive systems combine multiple technical components of hardware, algorithms, human computation, and interaction techniques. Their contributions will be judged by how well they enable and demonstrate novel interactive capabilities. “Enabling” contributions include datasets, tools, libraries, infrastructure, and languages. These contributions will be judged by how well they support the construction, engineering or validation of interactive systems and how well they can be shared among the research community to design future interactive systems.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Scott Bateman, University of New Brunswick, Canada
- Amy Zhang, University of Washington, USA
- Carl Gutwin, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Connor Geddes, University of Guelph, Canada
Associate Chairs
- Ofra Amir, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
- Michelle Annett, MishMashMakers, Canada
- Titus Barik, Apple, USA
- Andrea Bianchi, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), South Korea
- Jeffrey P. Bigham, Carnegie Mellon University / Apple, USA
- Yan Chen, Virginia Tech, USA
- Lung-Pan Cheng, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
- Lydia Chilton, Columbia University, USA
- Sauvik Das, Carnegie Melon University, USA
- Afsaneh Doryab, University of Virginia (SSO), USA
- Ruofei Du, Google AR, USA
- Elena Glassman, Harvard University, USA
- Alix Goguey, Université Grenoble Alpes, France
- Anhong Guo, University of Michigan, USA
- Teng Han, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
- Liang He, Purdue University, USA
- Ray Hong, George Mason University, USA
- Jennifer Jacobs, University of California Santa Barbara, USA
- Toby Jia-Jun Li, University of Notre Dame, USA
- Hongnan Lin, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
- Hyunyoung Kim, University of Birmingham, UK
- Ben Lafreniere, Reality Labs Research, Meta, Canada
- Jaeyeon Lee, UNIST, South Korea
- Uichin Lee, KAIST, South Korea
- Jiannan Li, Singapore Management University, Singapore
- Rong-Hao Liang, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Ken Nakagaki, University of Chicago, USA
- Koya Narumi, The University of Tokyo, Japan
- Michael Nebeling, University of Michigan, USA
- Jeff Nichols, Apple, USA
- Laurence Nigay, Université Grenoble Alpes, France
- Steve Oney, University of Michigan, USA
- Amy Pavel, University of Texas at Austin, USA
- Huaishu Peng, University of Maryland, College Park, USA
- Emmanuel Pietriga, Inria, France
- Kimiko Ryokai, University of California Berkeley, USA
- Zhida Sun, Shenzen University, China
- Ryo Suzuki, University of Calgary, Canada
- Amanda Swearngin, Apple, USA
- Tony Tang, Singapore Management University, Singapore
- Radu-Daniel Vatavu, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania
- Alex Williams, Amazon, USA
- Te-Yen Wu, Florida State University, USA
- Xing-Dong Yang, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Cheng Zhang, Cornell University, United States
- Tengxiang Zhang, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Contact: blend@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Enhancing Cross-Device Interaction Scripting with Interactive Illustrations
- Alloy: Clustering with Crowds and Computation
- Spatio-Temporal Modeling and Prediction of Visual Attention in Graphical User Interfaces
- Mining Human Behaviors from Fiction to Power Interactive Systems
- TableHop: An Actuated Fabric Display Using Transparent Electrodes
- SkullConduct: Biometric User Identification on Eyewear Computers Using Bone Conduction Through the Skull
- Using and Exploring Hierarchical Data in Spreadsheets
- Changibles: Analyzing and Designing Shape Changing Constructive Assembly
- Gesture Script: Recognizing Gestures and their Structure using Rendering Scripts and Interactively Trained Parts
- Smarties: An Input System for Wall Display Development
- Causality: A Conceptual Model of Interaction History
- “Emergent, crowd-scale programming practice in the IDE”
- WatchConnect: A Toolkit for Prototyping SmartWatch-Based Cross-Device Applications
- BaseLase: A Public Interactive Focus+Context Laser Floor
- Gesture On: Enabling Always-On Touch Gestures for Fast Mobile Access from the Device Standby Mode
- Addressing Misconceptions About Code with Always-On Programming Visualizations
- The BoomRoom: Mid-air Direct Interaction with Virtual Sound Sources
- Pervasive Information through Constant Personal Projection: The Ambient Mobile Pervasive Display (AMP-D)
- NewsViews: An Automated Pipeline for Creating Custom Geovisualizations for News
- SmartVoice: A Presentation Support System For Overcoming the Language Barrier
- Zensors: Adaptive, Rapidly Deployable, Human-Intelligent Sensor Feeds
- Blended Recommending: Integrating Interactive Information Filtering and Algorithmic Recommender Techniques
- ModelTracker: Redesigning Performance Analysis Tools for Machine Learning
Developing Novel Devices: Hardware, Materials, and Fabrication
This subcommittee focuses on advancing interaction through developing novel hardware and physical devices. It focuses on work where the core contribution is the new hardware or physical device. Typical contributions include, but are not limited to:
- new sensing and tracking devices
- display technology
- haptics feedback devices
- actuation and robotic approaches
- developments in materials that lead to novel interactive capabilities
- new fabrication techniques
Contributions will be judged based on the novelty of the resulting hardware prototype, the quality of the implementation, the showcased relevance through example applications, and the demonstrated improvements over existing hardware through a technical evaluation and where appropriate a user study. In addition, work in this subcommittee covers design tools that extend the type of interactive devices we can build today.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Alexandra Ion, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Jeeeun Kim, Texas A&M University, USA
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Nahyun Kwon, Texas A&M University, USA
- Violet Han, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Associate Chairs
- Nivedita Arora, Northwestern, USA
- Dan Ashbrook, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Patrick Baudisch, Hasso Plattner Institute, Germany
- Jan Borchers, RWTH Aachen University, Germany
- Jas Brooks, University of Chicago, USA
- Seongkook Heo, University of Virginia, USA
- Megan Hofmann, Northeastern University, USA
- Seungwoo Je, Southern University of Science and Technology, China
- Lawrence Kim, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Mackenzie Leake, Adobe Research, USA
- Pedro Lopes, University of Chicago, USA
- Nadya Peek, University of Washington, USA
- Michael Rivera, University of Colorado Boulder, USA
- Thijs Roumen, Cornell Tech, USA
- Enrico Rukzio, University of Ulm, Germany
- Martin Schmitz, Saarland University, Germany
- Adwait Sharma, University of Bath, UK
- Craig Shultz, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Guanyun Wang, Zhejiang University, China
- Yang Zhang, University of California Los Angeles, USA
- Kening Zhu, City University of Hong Kong, China
Contact: devices@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Fiberio: A Touchscreen that Senses Fingerprints
- Fingertip Tactile Devices for Virtual Object Manipulation and Exploration
- DextrES: Wearable Haptic Feedback for Grasping in VR via a Thin Form-Factor Electrostatic Brake
- Trigeminal-Based Temperature Illusions
- ShapeShift: 2D Spatial Manipulation and Self-Actuation of Tabletop Shape Displays for Tangible and Haptic Interaction
- Project Zanzibar: A Portable and Flexible Tangible Interaction Platform
- Photo-Chromeleon: Re-Programmable Multi-Color Textures Using Photochromic Dyes
- PrintScreen: Fabricating Highly Customizable Thin-Film Touch-Displays
- Project Jacquard: Interactive Digital Textiles at Scale
- Metamaterial Mechanisms
- Thermorph: Democratizing 4D Printing of Self-Folding Materials and Interfaces
- SATURN: A Thin and Flexible Self-powered Microphone Leveraging Triboelectric Nanogenerator
- LaserOrigami: Laser-Cutting 3D Objects
- RoMA: Interactive Fabrication with Augmented Reality and a Robotic 3D Printer
- A Layered Fabric 3D Printer for Soft Interactive Objects
- Printed Optics: 3D Printing of Embedded Optical Elements for Interactive Devices
- Shape-Aware Material: Interactive Fabrication with ShapeMe
- The Toastboard: Ubiquitous Instrumentation and Automated Checking of Breadboarded Circuits
- EM-Sense: Touch Recognition of Uninstrumented, Electrical and Electromechanical Objects
- Synthetic Sensors: Towards General-Purpose Sensing
- Wall++: Room-Scale Interactive and Context-Aware Sensing
- HyperCam: Hyperspectral Imaging for Ubiquitous Computing Applications
- Finexus: Tracking Precise Motions of Multiple Fingertips Using Magnetic Sensing
- PrivacyMic: Utilizing Inaudible Frequencies for Privacy Preserving Daily Activity Recognition
- PaperID: A Technique for Drawing Functional Battery-Free Wireless Interfaces on Paper
- Sozu: Self-Powered Radio Tags for Building-Scale Activity Sensing
Computational Interaction
This subcommittee invites papers whose primary contribution improves our understanding on how to design interactive systems underpinned by computational principles of human-computer interaction, including applications of such systems. Typical papers study or enhance interaction underpinned by, for instance, machine learning, optimization, statistical modeling, natural language processing, control theory, signal processing and computer vision. Beyond simply applying such methods, they seek new ways to describe, predict, and change interaction and guide the design of interactive systems that rely on computational methods or demonstrate applications of such systems. Core contributions typically take the form of novel theories, methods, techniques, and systems for computational approaches in HCI, as well as reports of rigorous empirical studies of interactive systems supported by computational approaches. Contributions will be judged by their rigor, significance, validity, and practical or theoretical impact.
Accepted papers contribute to our understanding of computational methods in human use of computing. The subcommittee is not limited to algorithms but welcomes a broad range of contributions, including but not limited to:
- Data set or analysis
- Empirical study, including replication studies
- Method
- Theory and modeling
- Design
- Commentary or essay
An excellent paper advances knowledge of computational approaches in human-computer interaction. Even in algorithmic contributions, the human viewpoint is central and kept visible throughout. In particular, an excellent paper 1) addresses a well-scoped phenomenon in human use of computers; 2) rigorously introduces and argues for the chosen approach, including assumptions both about humans and the computational approach, as well as differences and similarities with previous work; 3) explicates the claimed contribution in terms of benefit or disadvantage to humans; 4) provides adequate evidence; and 5) offers a balanced discussion of the contribution, including generalizability and limitations. In addition, critical viewpoints and negative findings are welcome. For example, a critical commentary of social implications of machine intelligence, an empirical insight to algorithmic threats, or a failed replication study are valued as contributions in this subcommittee.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Sven Mayer, LMU Munich, Germany
- John Williamson, University of Glasgow, UK
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Thomas Weber, LMU Munich, Germany
Associate Chairs
- Mihai Bace, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Miroslav Bachinski, University of Bergen, Norway
- Nikola Banovic, University of Michigan, USA
- Andreas Bulling, University of Stuttgart, Germany
- Daniel Buschek, University of Bayreuth, Germany
- Minsuk Chang, Google Research, South Korea
- Xiang ‘Anthony’ Chen, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Donald Degraen, Saarland University & German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Germany
- Anna Feit, Saarland University, Germany
- Arthur Fleig, University of Bayreuth, Germany
- Rebecca Fiebrink, Creative Computing Institute, University of the Arts London, UK
- Christoph Gebhardt, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
- Julien Gori, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, ISIR, Finland
- Takeo Igarashi, The University of Tokyo, Japan
- Weiwei Jiang, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China
- Enkelejda Kasneci, Technical University of Munich & TUM Center for Education Technologies, Germany
- Per Ola Kristensson, University of Cambridge, UK
- Gierad Laput, Apple, USA
- Luis A. Leiva, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Yang Li, Google Research, USA
- Yi-Chi Liao, Aalto University, Finland
- Michael Xieyang Liu, Google Research, USA
- Xiaojuan Ma, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
- Lena Mamykina, Columbia University, USA
- Roderick Murray-Smith, University of Glasgow, UK
- Changkun Ou, LMU Munich, Germany
- Jussi P. P. Jokinen, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
- Eldon Schoop, Apple, USA
- Metin Sezgin, Koç University, Turkey
- Brian A. Smith, Columbia University, USA
- Alison M Smith-Renner, Dataminr, USA
- Sherry Tongshuang Wu, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Yukang Yan, Carnegie Mellon University / University of Rochester, USA
- Qian Yang, Cornell University, USA
- Bereket A. Yilma, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Difeng Yu, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact: compint@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- XRgonomics: Facilitating the Creation of Ergonomic 3D Interfaces
- Evaluating the Interpretability of Generative Models by Interactive Reconstruction
- A Simulation Model of Intermittently Controlled Point-and-Click Behaviour
- Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
- Transcalibur: A Weight Shifting Virtual Reality Controller for 2D Shape Rendering based on Computational Perception Model
- Cluster Touch: Improving Touch Accuracy on Smartphones for People with Motor and Situational Impairments
- Optimising Encoding for Vibrotactile Skin Reading
- Crowdsourcing Interface Feature Design with Bayesian Optimization
- Predicting Cognitive Load in Future Code Puzzles
- NVGaze: An Anatomically-Informed Dataset for Low-Latency, Near-Eye Gaze Estimation
- May AI?: Design Ideation with Cooperative Contextual Bandits
- A Bayesian Cognition Approach to Improve Data Visualization
- Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms During Medical Decision-Making
- Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processes
- A is for Artificial Intelligence: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Activities on Young Children’s Perceptions of Robots
- Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction
- Understanding the Effect of Accuracy on Trust in Machine Learning Models
- Toward Algorithmic Accountability in Public Services
Critical Computing, Sustainability, and Social Justice
This subcommittee welcomes HCI research connected to themes of social justice, global sustainability, critical-reflective research practice, artful and aesthetic experiences, and critical computing-—all in pursuit of meaningful alternatives to the status quo. We encourage papers that explore how computing and computing research contributes to fair and just relations between individuals, social groups, and whole societies, locally and globally—all in the pursuit of fulfillment and flourishing. Submissions should feature any combination of one or more of the following:
- Antiracist, decolonial, feminist, and queer critique
- Commitments to equity, sustainability, survivance, and social justice
- Communication of perspectives from marginalized and unheard persons, groups, nations
- Attention to structural processes of power and control that produce and reproduce racialized, gendered, sexist, ableist, hetero/mononormative and colonial/postcolonial forms of violence, vulnerabilities, and exclusions
- Challenges to and/or new analyses of received knowledge and paradigms including critical and progressive accounts of alternative epistemologies, decolonial practices and theories, indigenous knowledges, and Majority Worlds perspectives
- Environmental justice, inter-generational justice, more than human worlds, technology and its implications in the climate crisis
- Explications of values and needs from diverse users and their communities
- Low-energy or zero carbon technologies and ways of life
- The pursuit of artful experiences and aesthetic ways of being and doing
- A robust and open politics
- The prominent use of philosophy and other theory
- The fostering of empathy, imagination, appreciation, and perception as community values
The subcommittee is epistemologically pluralistic, welcoming of a range of perspectives, approaches, and contributions that might take interpretivist, empirical, activist, political, ethical, critical, and/or pragmatic approaches to both societal challenges and how HCI research frames itself in relation to them. As a part of that commitment, we also champion diverse forms of scholarly expression in the CHI community, such as critical essays, research through design, practice-based research, design fictions, and commentaries.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Margot Brereton, Queensland University of Technology
- Mike Hazas, Uppsala University, Sweden
- Michael Muller, IBM Research, USA
Associate Chairs
- Aloha May Ambe, QUT, Australia
- Seyram Avle, University of Massachusetts, USA
- Karla Badillo-Urquiola, University of Notre Dame, USA
- Heidi Biggs, Georgia Tech, USA
- Filip Bircanin, QUT, Australia
- Nick Bryan-Kinns, University of the Arts London, UK
- Daniel Cardoso Llach, CMU, USA
- Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Pratt Institute, USA
- Marianela Ciolfi Felice, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
- Shion Guha, University of Toronto, Canada
- Naja Holten Møller, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Liesbeth Huybrechts, Hasselt University, Belgium
- Goda Klumbyte, University of Kassel, Germany
- Bran Knowles, Lancaster University, UK
- Calvin Laing, University of Washington, USA
- Cindy Lin, Cornell University, USA
- Cayley MacArthur, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Michael Madaio, Google Research, USA
- Effie Le Moignan, Northumbria University, UK
- Fabio Morreale, University of Auckland, New Zealand
- Ann Morrison, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand
- Mustafa Naseem, University of Michigan, USA
- Fayika Farhat Nova, Parkview, USA
- Samir Passi, KForce, USA
- Jessica Pater, Parkview, USA
- Alisha Pradhan, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA
- Matt Ratto, University of Toronto, Canada
- Chiara Rossitto, Stockholm University and Aalborg University, Sweden
- Sarah Rueller, University of Siegen, Germany
- Samar Sabie, University of Toronto Mississauga, USA
- Saiph Savage, Northeastern University and UNAM, USA
- Devansh Saxena, CMU, USA
- Katie Seaborn, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
- Bryan Semaan, Colorado University, USA
- Renee Shelby, Google Research, USA
- Akshita Sivakumar, UCSD, USA
- Robert Soden, University of Toronto, Canada
- Logan Stapleton, PhD Student at University of Minnesota, Visiting Student at Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Yolande Strengers, Monash University, Australia
- Alexandra To, Northeastern University, USA
- Austin Toombs, Indiana University, USA
- Rajesh Veeraraghavan, Georgetown University, USA
- Morgan Vigil-Hayes, Northern Arizona University, USA
- John Vines, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Marisol Wang-Villacres, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Ecuador
- Ihudiya Finda Williams, Virginia Tech, USA
- J.D. Zamfirescu, California College of the Arts, USA
- Cristina Zaga, University of Twente, Netherlands
Contact: critical@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Ali Alkhatib. 2021. To Live in Their Utopia: Why Algorithmic Systems Create Absurd Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445740
- Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Rachel E. Clarke, Charles Windlin, Anna Ståhl, Kristina Höök, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Emotion Work in Experience-Centered Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), 602:1-602:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300832
- Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. 1301. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
- Eli Blevis. 2018. Seeing What Is and What Can Be: On Sustainability, Respect for Work, and Design for Respect. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173944
- Marianela Ciolfi Felice, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, and Madeline Balaam. 2021. Resisting the Medicalisation of Menopause: Reclaiming the Body through Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. Retrieved June 15, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445153
- Christina Harrington and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2021. Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445723
- Maria Håkansson and Phoebe Sengers. 2013. Beyond being green: simple living families and ICT. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13), 2725–2734. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481378
- Nusrat Jahan Mim. 2021. Gospels of Modernity: Digital Cattle Markets, Urban Religiosity, and Secular Computing in the Global South. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445259
- Silvia Lindtner and Seyram Avle. 2017. Tinkering with Governance: Technopolitics and the Economization of Citizenship. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW: 70:1-70:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134705
- Elizabeth Kaziunas, Michael S. Klinkman, and Mark S. Ackerman. 2019. Precarious Interventions: Designing for Ecologies of Care. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 113:1-113:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359215
- Ann Light, Alison Powell, and Irina Shklovski. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis in the Anthropocene Age. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T ’17), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083688
- Noopur Raval and Paul Dourish. 2016. Standing Out from the Crowd: Emotional Labor, Body Labor, and Temporal Labor in Ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ’16), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820026
- Yolande Strengers, Jathan Sadowski, Zhuying Li, Anna Shimshak, and Florian “Floyd” Mueller. 2021. What Can HCI Learn from Sexual Consent? A Feminist Process of Embodied Consent for Interactions with Emerging Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445107
- Kaiton Williams. 2015. An Anxious Alliance. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1: 11–11. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21146
Design
This subcommittee is suitable for papers that make a significant designerly contribution to HCI. Papers submitted here develop and probe at various concerns, shaping design practice. Contributions include detailed descriptions of and reflections on design processes, interactive products, services, and systems that advance the state of the art; explorations and insights gleaned from working with interactive design materials; suggestions and provocations exploring new design tools, processes, methods, or principles, including those that explore alternatives to scientistic ways of knowing; work that applies perspectives from other disciplines to inspire or to critique the design of interactive things; or work that advances knowledge on the human activity of design as it relates to HCI research or practice. We particularly encourage contributions of new work that engages and builds upon the legacies of design in HCI to broaden the boundaries of interaction design and promote new aesthetic and sociocultural possibilities.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Laura Devendorf, University of Colorado Boulder, USA
- Vasiliki Tsaknaki, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Heekyoung Jung, University of Cincinnati, USA
- Daisy Yoo, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Eldy Lazaro Vasquez, University of Colorado Boulder, USA
- Deanna Gelosi, University of Colorado Boulder, USA
Associate Chairs
- Teresa Almeida, ITI/LARSyS, IST – U. Lisbon and Umeå University, Portugal
- Kristina Andersen, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Jeffrey Bardzell, Pennsylvania State University, USA
- Jesse Josua Benjamin, Lancaster University, UK
- Arne Berger, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Germany
- Mark Blythe, Northumbria University, UK
- David Chatting, Open Lab, Newcastle University, UK
- Ying-Yu Chen, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
- Nazli Cila, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Netherland
- Caroline Claisse, Open Lab, School of Computing, Newcastle University, UK
- Eric Corbett, Google Research, USA
- Aykut Coşkun, Koc University, Turkey
- Scott Davidoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA
- Graham Dove, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, USA
- Jodi Forlizzi, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Jonas Fritsch, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Verena Fuchsberger, University of Salzburg, Austria
- Mafalda Gamboa, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
- Maliheh Ghajargar, Chapman University, USA
- Bruna Goveia da Rocha, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Ian Gwilt, University of South Australia, Australia
- Karey Helms, Stockholm University, Sweden
- Sarah Homewood, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Jiwoo Hong, Samsung Electronics, South Korea
- Noura Howell, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Cindy (Hsin-Liu) Kao, Cornell University, USA
- Aisling Kelliher, University of Southern California, USA
- Dajung Kim, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
- Jung-Joo Lee, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Youn-kyung Lim, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), South Korea
- Maria Luce Lupetti, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
- Nusrat Jahan Mim, Harvard Graduate School of Design, USA
- Martin Murer, University of Salzburg, Austria
- Troy Nachtigall, Eindhoven University of Technology and Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands
- Bettina Nissen, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Michael Nitsche, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Claudia Núñez-Pacheco, KTH Sweden, Sweden
- Ian Oakley, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea
- HyunJoo Oh, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Doenja Oogjes, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- David Philip Green, Lancaster University, UK
- Maria Roussou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
- Ekaterina Stepanova, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Paul Strohmeier, Saarland University, Germany
- Jakob Tholander, Stockholm University, Sweden
- Cesar Torres, University of Texas at Arlington, USA
- Laia Turmo Vidal, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
- Anna Vallgårda, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Newcastle University, UK
- Richmond Wong, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Deepika Yadav, Stockholm University, Sweden
- Nur Yildirim, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Clement Zheng, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- John Zimmerman, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Contact: design@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Weaving Stories: Toward Repertoires for Designing Things.
- Crafting Interactive Circuits on Glazed Ceramic Ware</li>
- Understanding Everyday Experiences of Reminiscence for People with Blindness: Practices, Tensions and Probing New Design Possibilities
- Proceed with Care: Reimagining Home IoT Through a Care Perspective
- Designing Menstrual Technologies with Adolescents
- Sketching NLP: A Case Study of Exploring the Right Things To Design with Language Intelligence
- The SelfReflector: Design, IoT and the High Street
- From Research Prototype to Research Product
- Indoor Weather Stations: Investigating a Ludic Approach to Environmental HCI through Batch Prototyping
- Field Trial of Tiramisu: Crowd-Sourcing Bus Arrival Times to Spur Co-Design
- Making Multiple Uses of the Obscura 1C Digital Camera: Reflecting on the Design, Production, Packaging and Distribution of a Counterfunctional Device
- Artful Systems in the Home
- Sabbath Day Home Automation: It’s Like Mixing Technology and Religion
- Empathy and Experience in HCI
- What Should We Expect from Research Through Design?
- Research Through Design as a Method for interaction Design Research in HCI
- On Looking at the Vagina through Labella
- Somaesthetic Appreciation Design
- Making Design Memoirs: Understanding and Honoring Difficult Experiences
- Revisiting the jacquard loom: threads of history and current patterns in HCI
- Making Public Things: How HCI Design Can Express matters of Concern
- Do-it-Yourself Cellphones: An Investigation into the Possibilities and Limits of High-Tech DIY
- Stay on the Boundary: Artifact Analysis Exploring Researcher and User Framing of Robot Design
- DIYbio Things: Open Source Biology Tools as Platforms for Hybrid Knowledge Production and Scientific Participation
- On the Design of OLO Radio: Investigating Metadata as a Design Material
Games and Play
This subcommittee is suitable for papers across all areas of playful interaction, player experience, and games. Examples of topics include: game interaction and interfaces, playful systems (e.g., toys, books, leisure), the design and development of games (including serious games and gamification), player experience evaluation (player psychology, games user research, and game analytics), the study of player and developer communities, and understanding play.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Elizabeth Bonsignore, University of Maryland, College Park/HCIL, USA
- Alena Denisova, University of York, UK
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Nick von Felten, University of Basel, Switzerland
Associate Chairs
- Dmitry Alexandrovsky, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- Maximilian Altmeyer, Saarland University of Applied Sciences, Germany
- Oğuz ‘Oz’ Buruk, Tampere University, Finland
- Sebastian Cmentowski, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Joe Cutting, University of York, UK
- Sebastian Deterding, Imperial College London, UK
- Guo Freeman, Clemson University, USA
- Julian Frommel, Utrecht University, Netherlands
- Kathrin Gerling, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- William Hamilton, New Mexico State University, USA
- Erik Harpstead, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Yubo Kou, Pennsylvania State University, USA
- Simone Kriglstein, Masaryk University, Czech Republic
- Effie Lai-Chong Law, Durham University, UK
- Zhuying Li, Southeast University, China
- Conor Linehan, University College Cork, Ireland
- Joe Marshall, University of Nottingham, UK
- Mitchell McEwan, Macquarie University, Australia
- Elisa Mekler, University of Copenhagen (ITU), Denmark
- Amon Rapp, University of Torino, Italy
- Katja Rogers, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Melissa Rogerson, University of Melbourne, Australia
- Gillian Smith, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, USA
- Günter Wallner, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
- Richard Wetzel, DePaul University, USA
Contact: games@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- The Ethics of Multiplayer Game Design and Community Management: Industry Perspectives and Challenges
- BreathVR: Leveraging Breathing as a Directly Controlled Interface for Virtual Reality Games
- Bots & (Main)Frames: Exploring the Impact of Tangible Blocks and Collaborative Play in an Educational Programming Game
- BreathVR: Leveraging Breathing as a Directly Controlled Interface for Virtual Reality Games
- Cooperating to Compete: the Mutuality of Cooperation and Competition in Boardgame Play
- Empirical Support for a Causal Relationship Between Gamification and Learning Outcomes
- Designing Movement-Based Play with Young People Using Powered Wheelchairs
- Prototyping in PLACE: A Scalable Approach to Developing Location-Based Apps and Games
- Designing Action-Based Exergames for Children with Cerebral Palsy
- Experiencing the Body as Play
- Designing Brutal Multiplayer Video Games
- Extracting Design Guidelines for Wearables and Movement in Tabletop Role-Playing Games via a Research Through Design Process
- The Privilege of Immersion: Racial and Ethnic Experiences, Perceptions, and Beliefs in Digital Gaming
- Video Game Selection Procedures For Experimental Research
- “An Odd Kind of Pleasure”: Differentiating Emotional Challenge in Digital Games
- Player-Driven Game Analytics: The Case of Guild Wars 2
- Understanding and Mitigating Challenges for Non-Profit Driven Indie Game Development to Innovate Game Production
Health
This subcommittee is suitable for contributions related to health, wellness, and medicine, including physical, mental, and emotional well-being, clinical environments, self-management, and everyday wellness. Accepted papers will balance the rigor required in all CHI submissions with awareness of the challenges of conducting research in these challenging contexts. The research problem can be grounded in both formal and informal health and care contexts. Submissions to this subcommittee will be evaluated in part based on their inclusion of and potential impact on their stakeholders. We welcome papers that are empirical, theoretical, conceptual, methodological, design, and systems contributions. Papers must have a clear and novel contribution to HCI in terms of our understanding of people’s interaction with technology in a healthcare context, or the design of health and wellness technologies. For example, systematic reviews or usability studies associated with clinical trials must also have contributions for the HCI community.
Subcommittee Chairs
- David Coyle, University College Dublin, Ireland
- Daniel Epstein, University of California, Irvine, USA
- Aneesha Singh, University College London, UK
Associate Chairs
- Ignacio Avellino, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, France
- Amid Ayobi, University College London, UK
- Sang Won Bae, Stevens Institute of Technology, USA
- Abdelkareem Bedri, Apple, USA
- Jon Bird, University of Bristol, UK
- Max Birk, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Christina Chung, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
- Franceli Cibrian, Chapman University, USA
- Martin Dechant, UCL, UK
- Pin Sym Foong, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Daniel Gooch, Open University, UK
- Ruben Gouveia, University of Twente, Netherlands
- Mohit Jain, Microsoft Research India, India
- Ravi Karkar, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
- Young-Ho Kim, NAVER AI Lab, South Korea
- Rachel Kornfield, Northwestern University, USA
- Amanda Lazar, University of Maryland, USA
- Zilu Liang, Kyoto University of Advanced Science, Japan
- Yuhan Luo, City University of Hong Kong, China
- Alex Mariakakis, University of Toronto, Canada
- Terika McCall, Yale University, USA
- Daniel McDuff, Google, USA
- Roisin McNaney, Monash University, Australia
- Jochen Meyer, OFFIS – Institute for Information Technology, Germany
- Sonali Mishra, University of Michigan, USA
- Kellie Morrissey, School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Ireland
- Elizabeth Murnane, Dartmouth College, USA
- Camille Nadal, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
- Nicola Newhouse, Oxford, UK
- Jasmin Niess, University of Oslo, Norway
- Dilisha Patel, Global Disability Innovation (GDI) Hub, UK
- Talya Porat, Imperial College London, UK
- Tauhidur Rahman, UC San Diego, USA
- Shriti Raj, Stanford University, USA
- Tera Reynolds, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA
- Herman Saksono, Northeastern University, USA
- Stephen Schueller, University of California, Irvine, USA
- Patrick Shih, Indiana University, USA
- Anna Sigridur Islind, Reykjavik University, Iceland
- Petr Slovak, King’s College London, UK
- Katarzyna Stawarz, Cardiff University, UK
- Vedant Swain, Northeastern University, USA
- Anupriya Tuli, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), India
- Vero Vanden Abeele, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Nervo Verdezoto, Cardiff University, UK
- Jason Wiese, University of Utah, USA
- Paweł W. Woźniak, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
- Svetlana Yarosh, University of Minnesota, USA
- Renwen Zhang, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Contact: health@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Reem Talhouk, Sandra Mesmar, Anja Thieme, Madeline Balaam, Patrick Olivier, Chaza Akik, and Hala Ghattas. 2016. Syrian Refugees and Digital Health in Lebanon: Opportunities for Improving Antenatal Health. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 331–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858331
- Elizabeth Stowell, Mercedes C. Lyson, Herman Saksono, Reneé C. Wurth, Holly Jimison, Misha Pavel, and Andrea G. Parker. 2018. Designing and Evaluating mHealth Interventions for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 15, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173589
- Eric B. Hekler, Predrag Klasnja, Jon E. Froehlich, and Matthew P. Buman. 2013. Mind the theoretical gap: interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3307–3316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466452
- Yuhan Luo, Peiyi Liu, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2019. Co-Designing Food Trackers with Dietitians: Identifying Design Opportunities for Food Tracker Customization. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 592, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300822
- Elizabeth L. Murnane, Xin Jiang, Anna Kong, Michelle Park, Weili Shi, Connor Soohoo, Luke Vink, Iris Xia, Xin Yu, John Yang-Sammataro, Grace Young, Jenny Zhi, Paula Moya, and James A. Landay. 2020. Designing Ambient Narrative-Based Interfaces to Reflect and Motivate Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376478
- Emma Beede, Elizabeth Baylor, Fred Hersch, Anna Iurchenko, Lauren Wilcox, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, and Laura M. Vardoulakis. 2020. A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376718
- Maximilian Dürr, Carla Gröschel, Ulrike Pfeil, and Harald Reiterer. 2020. NurseCare: Design and ‘In-The-Wild’ Evaluation of a Mobile System to Promote the Ergonomic Transfer of Patients. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376851
- Yuan Liang, Hsuan Wei Fan, Zhujun Fang, Leiying Miao, Wen Li, Xuan Zhang, Weibin Sun, Kun Wang, Lei He, and Xiang ‘Anthony’ Chen. 2020. OralCam: Enabling Self-Examination and Awareness of Oral Health Using a Smartphone Camera. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376238
- Sachin R Pendse, Amit Sharma, Aditya Vashistha, Munmun De Choudhury, and Neha Kumar. 2021. “Can I Not Be Suicidal on a Sunday?”: Understanding Technology-Mediated Pathways to Mental Health Support. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 545, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445410
- Ryan M. Kelly, Yueyang Cheng, Dana McKay, Greg Wadley, and George Buchanan. 2021. “It’s About Missing Much More Than the People”: How Students use Digital Technologies to Alleviate Homesickness. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 226, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445362
- Cassidy Pyle, Lee Roosevelt, Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, and Nazanin Andalibi. 2021. LGBTQ Persons’ Pregnancy Loss Disclosures to Known Ties on Social Media: Disclosure Decisions and Ideal Disclosure Environments. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 543, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445331
- Camille Nadal, Shane McCully, Kevin Doherty, Corina Sas, and Gavin Doherty. 2022. The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 233, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502039
- Ananya Bhattacharjee, Joseph Jay Williams, Jonah Meyerhoff, Harsh Kumar, Alex Mariakakis, and Rachel Kornfield. 2023. Investigating the Role of Context in the Delivery of Text Messages for Supporting Psychological Wellbeing. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 494, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580774
- Eunkyung Jo, Daniel A. Epstein, Hyunhoon Jung, and Young-Ho Kim. 2023. Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Deploying Conversational AI Leveraging Large Language Models for Public Health Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581503
Interacting with Devices: Interaction Techniques & Modalities
This subcommittee focuses on enabling interactions using different modalities, such as touch, gestures, speech & sound, haptics & force feedback, gaze, smell, and physiological signals (e.g., heart rate, muscle tension, brain waves, and breath), on different devices (hand-held, stationary, head-mounted, wrist-mounted, in midair, on-body) and for different domains (on 2D screens, in 3D environments, as tangibles). Contributions will be judged based how well a proposed approach solves a significant existing problem or how well it opens new and compelling opportunities for interactions. The novelty of the interaction, its design rationale, and evaluations demonstrating improvements over existing interaction techniques are particularly well suited for this committee.
If the main contribution of a submission is novel hardware or a fabrication method, we ask authors to submit to the Developing Novel Devices subcommittee instead.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Diego Martinez Plasencia, University College London, UK
- David Lindlbauer, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Hyunsung Cho, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Zhouyang Shen, University College London, UK
Associate Chairs
- Parastoo Abtahi, Princeton University, USA
- Karan Ahuja, Northwestern University, USA
- Mayra Donaji Barrera Machuca, Dalhousie University, Canada
- Frederik Brudy, Autodesk Research, Canada
- Debaleena Chattopadhyay, University of Illinois Chicago, USA
- Andreas Fender, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Tiare Feuchtner, University of Konstanz, Germany & Aarhus University, Denmark
- Mauricio Fontana de Vargas, McGill University, Canada
- Mike Fraser, University of Bristol, UK
- Hans Gellersen, Lancaster University, UK & Aarhus University, Denmark
- Jens Emil Grønbæk, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Tovi Grossman, University of Toronto, Canada
- Jens Grubert, Coburg University, Germany
- Jan Gugenheimer, TU-Darmstadt, Germany & Télécom Paris, France
- Aakar Gupta, Fujitsu Research, USA
- Khalad Hasan, University of Manitoba, Canada
- Ryuji Hirayama, University College London, United Kingdom
- Steven Houben, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Pourang Irani, UBC, Canada
- Sandeep Kaur Kuttal, North Carolina State University, USA
- Byungjoo Lee, Yonsei University, South Korea
- Asier Marzo, Public University of Navarre, Spain
- Timothy Merritt, Aalborg University, Denmark
- Florian Müller, LMU Munich, Germany
- Ken Pfeuffer, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Daniel Pires de Sa Medeiros, Télécom Paris & Institut Polytechnique de Paris, France
- Hasti Seifi, Arizona State University, USA
- Marcos Serrano, IRIT – University of Toulouse 3, France
- Mauricio Sousa, University of Toronto, Canada
- Hariharan Subramonyam, Stanford University, USA
- Chi Thanh Vi, International University, VNU-HCM, Vietnam, UK
- Kashyap Todi, Meta Reality Labs, USA
- Madhan Kumar Vasudevan, University College London, United Kingdom
- Jo Vermeulen, Autodesk Research, Canada
- Daniel Vogel, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Qianwen Wang, University of Minnesota, USA
- Yuntao Wang, Tsinghua University, China
- Andy Wilson, Microsoft Research, USA
- Wenge Xu, Birmingham City University, United Kingdom
- Xuhai “Orson” Xu, University of Washington & Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
- Shengdong Zhao, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Contact: inttech@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Object-Oriented Drawing
- Video Browsing by Direct Manipulation
- The Effect of Visual Appearance on the Performance of Continuous Sliders and Visual Analogue Scales
- A Dose of Reality: Overcoming Usability Challenges in VR Head-Mounted Displays
- IllumiRoom: Peripheral Projected Illusions for Interactive Experiences
- Draco: Bringing Life to Illustrations with Kinetic Textures
- VelociTap: Investigating Fast Mobile Text Entry using Sentence-Based Decoding of Touchscreen Keyboard Input
- Smart Touch: Improving Touch Accuracy for People with Motor Impairments with Template Matching
- Impact of Task on Attentional Tunneling in Handheld Augmented Reality
- Pinpointing: Precise Head- and Eye-Based Target Selection for Augmented Reality
- One does not simply RSVP: mental workload to select speed reading parameters using electroencephalography
- In-Depth Mouse: Integrating Desktop Mouse into Virtual Reality
- Designing Visuo-Haptic Illusions with Proxies in Virtual Reality: Exploration of Grasp, Movement Trajectory and Object Mass
- Feeling colours: Crossmodal correspondences between tangible 3d objects, colours and emotions
- SensaBubble: A Chrono-Sensory Mid-Air Display of Sight and Smell
- Causality-preserving Asynchronous Reality
Interaction Beyond the Individual
This subcommittee is suitable for papers that contribute to our understanding of collaborative technologies for groups, organizations, communities, and networks. Successful submissions will advance knowledge, theories, and insights from the social, psychological, behavioral, and organizational practice that arise from technology use in various social and collaborative contexts. This subcommittee is also suitable for submissions describing collaborative or crowdsourcing tools or systems.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Haiyi Zhu, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Niels van Berkel, Aalborg University, Denmark
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Rune Møberg Jacobsen, Aalborg University, Denmark
Associate Chairs
- Tawfiq Ammari, Rutgers University, USA
- Alexander Boden, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Science, and Fraunhofer-Institute for Applied Information Systems FIT, Germany
- Stevie Chancellor, University of Minnesota, USA
- Priyank Chandra, University of Toronto, Canada
- Hao-Fei Cheng, Amazon, USA
- Shiwei Cheng, Zhejiang University of Technology, China
- Motahhare Eslami, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Ali Farooq, University of Strathclyde, UK
- Michele Geronazzo, University of Padua, Italy
- Tesh Goyal, Jigsaw, Google, USA
- Danula Hettiachchi, RMIT University, Australia
- Yun Huang, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, USA
- Jack Jamieson, NTT, Japan
- Yao Li, University of Central Florida, USA
- Thomas Ludwig, University of Hagen, Germany
- Yelena Mejova, ISI Foundation, Italy
- Matti Nelimarkka, University of Helsinki and Aalto University, Finland
- Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Orestis Papakyriakopoulos, Sony AI, Switzerland
- Joseph Seering, Stanford University, USA
- Hong Shen, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Lise St. Denis, University of Colorado, CIRES, Earth Lab, USA
- Matthieu Tixier, Université de Technologie de Troyes, France
- Christina Vasiliou, University of York, UK
- Hao-Chuan Wang, University of California, Davis, USA
- Chi-Lan Yang, The University of Tokyo, Japan
- Peng Zhang, Fudan University, China
Contact: ibti@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- “I normally wouldn’t talk with strangers”: Introducing a Socio-Spatial Interface for Fostering Togetherness Between Strangers
- Understanding Context to Capture when Reconstructing Meaningful Spaces for Remote Instruction and Connecting in XR
- The Walking Talking Stick: Understanding Automated Note-Taking in Walking Meetings
- ‘Keeping our Faith Alive’: Investigating Buddhism Practice during COVID-19 to Inform Design for the Online Community Practice of Faith
- What Life Events are Disclosed on Social Media, How, When, and By Whom?
- Significant Otter: Understanding the Role of Biosignals in Communication
- Current Practices, Challenges, and Design Implications for Collaborative AR/VR Application Development
- “Oops…”: Mobile Message Deletion in Conversation Error and Regret Remediation
- Designing Telepresence Drones to Support Synchronous, Mid-air Remote Collaboration: An Exploratory Study
- Uncovering the Promises and Challenges of Social Media Use in the Low-Wage Labor Market: Insights from Employers
- Bedtime Window: A Field Study Connecting Bedrooms of Long-Distance Couples Using a Slow Photo-Stream and Shared Real-Time Inking
- Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetings
Learning, Education, and Families
The “Learning and Education” component of this subcommittee is suitable for contributions that deepen our understanding of how to design, build, deploy, and/or study technologies for learning processes and in educational settings. Topics may include (but are not limited to): intelligent tutoring systems; multimedia interfaces for learning; learning analytics; systems for collaborative learning and social discussion; technology-supported learning; teacher/educator-facing designs; and tangible learning interfaces. These may be suitable for a variety of settings: online learning, learning at scale; primary, secondary, and higher education; informal learning in museums, libraries, homes, and after-school settings.
The “Families” component of this subcommittee is suitable for contributions that extend design and understanding of how children, parents, and families interact with technology. Topics may include (but are not limited to) a wide range of domains that span health and well-being, social, psychological, and cultural phenomena.
While submissions will be evaluated for their impact on the specific application and/or group that they address, papers must also make a substantial contribution to HCI. In reflecting on their paper’s potential contribution to HCI, authors may wish to examine past proceedings; see the Contributions to CHI page.
This subcommittee is intended to handle many of the papers that went to and were reviewed under a split of Specific Applications Areas in CHI 2018 and earlier.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, Graz University of Technology, Austria
- Lisa Anthony, University of Florida, USA
- Alexis Hiniker, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
- Rene Kizilcec, Cornell University, USA
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Leonie Disch, Graz University of Technology, Austria
- Bob Zhang, Cornell University, USA
Associate Chairs
- June Ahn, University of California, Irvine, USA
- Pengcheng An, Southern University of Science and Technology, China
- Zhen Bai, University of Rochester, USA
- Ivo Benke, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- Min Chi, North Carolina State University, USA
- Mutlu Cukurova, University College London, United Kingdom
- Maitraye Das, Northeastern University, USA
- Sayamindu Dasgupta, University of Washington, USA
- Katie Davis, University of Washington, USA
- Shayan Doroudi, University of California, Irvine, USA
- Vanessa Echeverria, Monash University, Australia
- Min Fan, Communication University of China, China
- Michail Giannakos, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
- Gahgene Gweon, Seoul National University, South Korea
- Heidi Hartikainen, University of Oulu, Finland
- Michael Horn, Northwestern University, USA
- Netta Ilvari, University of Oulu, Finland
- Toni-Jan Keith Monserrat, Senti Techlabs Inc., Philippines
- Samuli Laato, Tampere University, Finland
- Monica Landoni, Università della Svizzera italiana, USI, Switzerland
- Michael Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA
- Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Monash University, Australia
- Joseph E Michaelis, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
- Briana Morrison, University of Virginia, USA
- Zach Pardos, University of California Berkeley (UC Berkeley), USA
- Zhenhui Peng, Sun Yat-sen University, China
- Elisa Rubegni, Lancaster University, UK
- Angela Stewart, University of Pittsburgh, USA
- Selen Türkay, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
- Judith Odili Uchidiuno, Georgia Tech, USA
- Olga Viberg, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
- Thiemo Wambsganss, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland
- April Wang, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
- Xu Wang, University of Michigan, USA
- Julia Woodward, University of South Florida, USA
- Ying Xu, University of Michigan, USA
- Jason Yip, University of Washington, USA
Contact: learning@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Unobtrusively Enhancing Reflection-in-Action of Teachers through Spatially Distributed Ambient Information
- Mudslide: A Spatially Anchored Census of Student Confusion for Online Lecture Videos
- JuxtaPeer: Comparative Peer Review Yields Higher Quality Feedback and Deeper Reflection
- BodyVis: A New Approach to Body Learning Through Wearable Sensing and Visualization
- Science Everywhere: Designing Public, Tangible Displays to Connect Youth Learning Across Settings
- Screen Time Tantrums: How Families Manage Screen Media Experiences for Toddlers and Preschoolers
- Coco’s Videos: An Empirical Investigation of Video-Player Design Features and Children’s Media Use
- Facilitator, Functionary, Friend or Foe?: Studying the Role of iPads within Learning Activities Across a School Year
- MapSense: Multi-Sensory Interactive Maps for Children Living with Visual Impairments
- Showing Face in Video Instruction: Effects on Information Retention, Visual Attention, and Affect
- Motivation as a Lens to Understand Online Learners: Toward Data-Driven Design with the OLEI Scale
- Teaching Language and Culture with a Virtual Reality Game
- Mediating Conflicts in Minecraft: Empowering Learning in Online Multiplayer Games
- ThinkActive: Designing for Pseudonymous Activity Tracking in the Classroom
- Group Spinner: Recognizing and Visualizing Learning in the Classroom for Reflection, Communication, and Planning
- As We May Study: Towards the Web as a Personalized Language Textbook
- Why Interactive Learning Environments Can Have It All: Resolving Design Conflicts Between Competing Goals
- Wearables for Learning: Examining the Smartwatch as a Tool for Situated Science Reflection
Privacy and Security
This subcommittee is suitable for papers relating to privacy and security. This includes but is not limited to: new techniques/systems/technologies, evaluations of existing/new systems, lessons learned from real-world deployments, foundational research identifying important theoretical and/or design insight for the community, etc. Submissions will be judged based on the contribution they make to privacy and security as well as their impact on HCI. For instance, papers that focus on technical contributions will need to show the relationship of the contribution to humans and user experience.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Yang Wang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Janne Lindqvist, Aalto University, Finland
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Minna Nevanoja, Aalto University, Finland
- Tanusree Sharma, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Associate Chairs
- Yasmeen Abdrabou, Lancaster University, United Kingdom
- Ruba Abu-Salma, King’s College London, United Kingdom
- Tousif Ahmed, Google, USA
- Taslima Akter, University of California Irvine, USA
- Konstantin Beznosov, University of British Columbia, Canada
- Camille Cobb, University of Illinois, USA
- Sanchari Das, University of Denver, USA
- Houda Elmimouni, Indiana University, USA
- Pardis Emami-Naeini, Duke University, USA
- Cori Faklaris, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA
- Rakibul Hasan, Arizona State University, USA
- Haojian Jin, University of California San Diego, USA
- Chris Kanich, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA
- Apu Kapadia, Indiana University, USA
- Marc Langheinrich, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Switzerland
- Tianshi Li, University of California Berkeley, USA
- Ilaria Liccardi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), USA
- Karola Marky, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
- Mainack Mondal, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT Kharagpur), India
- Alena Naiakshina, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
- Vit Rusnak, Masaryk University, Czech Republic
- Florian Schaub, University of Michigan, USA
- Jose Such, King’s College London, UK
- Mohammad Tahaei, eBay / International Computer Science Institute, USA
- Eran Toch, Tel Aviv University, Israel
- Blase Ur, University of Chicago, USA
- Melanie Volkamer, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- Ye Wang, University of Macau, Macau
- Xin Yi, Tsinghua University, China
- Yixin Zou, Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy in Bochum, Germany
Contact: privacy@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- A Field Trial of Privacy Nudges for Facebook
- Can I Borrow Your Phone?: Understanding Concerns When Sharing Mobile Phones
- Does My Password Go Up to Eleven?: The Impact of Password Meters on Password Selection
- Experimenting at Scale with Google Chrome’s SSL warning
- High Costs and Small Benefits: A Field Study of How Users Experience Operating System Upgrades
- I Feel Like I’m Taking Selfies All Day!: Towards Understanding Biometric Authentication on Smartphones
- In Situ with Bystanders of Augmented Reality Glasses: Perspectives on Recording and Privacy-Mediating Technologies
- Leakiness and Creepiness in App Space: Perceptions of Privacy and Mobile App Use
- “My Religious Aunt Asked Why I Was Trying to Sell Her Viagra”: Experiences with Account Hijacking
- Privacy Concerns and Behaviors of People with Visual Impairments
- Reflection or Action?: How Feedback and Control Affect Location Sharing Decisions
- Scaling the Security Wall: Developing a Security Behavior Intentions Scale (SeBIS)
- Stories from Survivors: Privacy & Security Practices when Coping with Intimate Partner Abuse
- The Presentation Effect on Graphical Passwords
- Unpacking “Privacy” for a Networked World
- Using Personal Examples to Improve Risk Communication for Security & Privacy Decisions
- Touch Me Once and I Know It’s You! Implicit Authentication Based on Touch Screen Patterns
- Passquerade: Improving Error Correction of Text Passwords on Mobile Devices by using Graphic Filters for Password Masking
Specific Applications Areas
This subcommittee is suitable for papers that extend knowledge of how to design, build, deploy, and/or study technologies for specific application areas, user groups, or domains of interest to the HCI community, that are not explicitly covered by another subcommittee. Example application areas and user groups are listed below. Submissions will be evaluated in part based on their impact on the specific application area and/or user group that they address, in addition to their impact on the HCI community and the quality of the research methods employed
Example user groups: people in low- and middle-income countries, charities and third sector organizations, marginal/marginalized population, workers, people with disabilities, non-human stakeholders (such as insects, animals), farmers, and children.
Example application areas: ICTD, HCI4D, creativity, making and fabrication, home, participatory/participative cultures, rural communities, smart and connected communities, transportation, urban informatics, health of marginalized groups, civic engagement, intimate interaction, child-computer interaction, and animal-computer interaction.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Celine Latulipe, University of Manitoba, Canada
- Adrian Clear, University of Galway, Ireland
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Ananta Chowdhury, University of Manitoba, Canada
Associate Chairs
- Ali Agha Raza, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan, Pakistan
- André Calero Valdez, University of Lübeck, Germany
- Jay Chen, ICSI, USA
- Jinghui Cheng, Polytechnique Montreal, Canada
- Carrie Demmans Epp, University of Alberta, Canada, Canada
- Abigail Evans, University of York, UK
- Daniel Fitton, University of Central Lancashire, UK
- Adam Fourney, Microsoft Research, USA
- Dilrukshi Gamage, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
- Aakash Gautam, University of Pittsburgh, USA
- Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas, University of Glasgow, UK
- Jonathan Hook, University of York, UK
- Simo Hosio, University of Oulu & The University of Tokyo, Finland
- Hyunggu Jung, University of Seoul, South Korea
- Naveena Karusala, Harvard University, USA
- Rébecca Kleinberger, Northeastern University & Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
- Auk Kim, Kangwon National University, South Korea
- Jennifer G. Kim, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
- Chinmay Kulkarni, Emory University, USA
- Ha-Kyung Hidy Kong, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
- Matthew Louis Mauriello, University of Delaware, USA
- Zhicong Lu, City University of Hong Kong, China
- Jamie Mahoney, Northumbria University, UK
- Laura Maye, University College Cork, Ireland
- Eleonora Mencarini, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Italy
- Alberto Monge Roffarello, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
- Kyrill Potapov, University College London, UK
- Janet Read, University of Central Lancashire, UK
- Carolin Reichherzer, Independent, Switzerland
- Dina Sabie, Humber College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Stacey Scott, University of Guelph, Canada
- Pushpendra Singh, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), India
- Xin Tong, Duke Kunshan University, China
- Milka Trajkova, Georgia Tech, USA
- Aditya Vashistha, Cornell University, USA
- Dhaval Vyas, University of Queensland, Australia
- Kristin Williams, Emory University, USA
- Robert Xiao, University of British Columbia, Canada
- Chuang-Wen You, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
Contact: specapps@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Investigating Genres and Perspectives in HCI Research on the Home
- Understanding and Mitigating the Effects of Device and Cloud Service Design Decisions on the Environmental Footprint of Digital Infrastructure
- BodyVis: A New Approach to Body Learning Through Wearable Sensing and Visualization
- MapSense: Multi-Sensory Interactive Maps for Children Living with Visual Impairments
- Motif: Supporting Novice Creativity through Expert Patterns
- Toward Algorithmic Accountability in Public Services: A Qualitative Study of Affected Community Perspectives on Algorithmic Decision-making in Child Welfare Services
- Online Grocery Delivery Services: An Opportunity to Address Food Disparities in Transportation-scarce Areas
- Mapping the Margins: Navigating the Ecologies of Domestic Violence Service Provision
- Guerilla Warfare and the Use of New (and Some Old) Technology: Lessons from FARC’s Armed Struggle in Colombia
- From Her Story, to Our Story: Digital Storytelling as Public Engagement around Abortion Rights Advocacy in Ireland
- Practices and Technology Needs of a Network of Farmers in Tharaka Nithi, Kenya
- Empowerment on the Margins: The Online Experiences of Community Health Workers
- Design Within a Patriarchal Society: Opportunities and Challenges in Designing for Rural Women in Bangladesh
- Human-Nature Relations in Urban Gardens: Explorations with Camera Traps
Understanding People
This subcommittee welcomes submissions whose primary contribution targets an improved understanding of people and/or interactional contexts, as opposed to submissions whose primary focus is on understanding the system or technology. Most submissions are empirical in nature, but they can also be conceptual. For empirical papers, the research can use statistical and quantitative, qualitative, or mixed and alternative methods.
Suitable topics for the subcommittee include, but are not limited to: individual behavior, human performance, as well as group, social, and collaborative behaviors and action. Core contributions typically take the form of insightful findings, evolved theories, models, concepts, or methods. Submissions may examine technology practices of diverse populations, and unique, understudied cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic contexts. Contributions will be evaluated for their rigor, significance, originality, validity, and practical or theoretical contributions.
You can submit directly to an Understanding People split depending on the primary method used. Choosing the appropriate method split will ensure the ACs and reviewers are suitable to evaluate your paper’s methods. The options are:
- Statistical and quantitative methods. For example, papers that use experimental manipulations and statistical methods to derive conclusions, or papers that use large datasets and (statistical, analytical) models to derive conclusions.
- Qualitative methods. Papers whose contributions rest on methods such as interviews, observations, focus groups, diaries, (auto-)ethnography, specific document / content analysis, etc., where the implications of the work may not be generalizable, but add further insights to our understanding of human behavior.
- Mixed and alternative methods: 1) a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods where the combination of the two approaches is significant; and 2) alternative or novel research methods, such as action research, first-person research, etc.
Understanding People — Statistical and Quantitative Methods
Subcommittee Chairs (Statistical and Quantitative Methods)
- Chris Janssen, Utrecht University, Netherlands
- Q Vera Liao, Microsoft Research, Canada
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Floor Bontje, Utrecht University, Netherlands
- Talha Özüdoğru, Utrecht University, Netherlands
Associate Chairs
- Sultan A. Alharthi, University of Jeddah, KSA, Saudi Arabia
- Nigel Bosch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Regina Bernhaupt, Eindhoven University, Netherlands
- Jie Cai, Pennsylvania State University, USA
- Eshwar Chandrasekharan, UIUC, USA
- Jessie Chin, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Christopher Clarke, University of Bath, UK
- Sanorita Dey, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA
- Hyo Jin (Gina) Do, IBM, USA
- Ujwal Gadiraju, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
- Ceenu George, Google, Germany
- Diego Gómez-Zará, University of Notre Dame, USA
- Hanna Hauptman, Utrecht University, Netherlands
- Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang, Cornell University, USA
- Stephen Hutt, University of Denver, USA
- Sanjay Kairam, Reddit, USA
- Harmanpreet Kaur, University of Minnesota, USA
- Yi-Chieh (EJ) Lee, NUS, Singapore
- Hanlin Li, University of Texas at Austin, USA
- Andreas Löcken, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Germany
- Tun Lu, Fudan University, China
- Nathan McNeese, Clemson University, USA
- Caitlin Mills, University of Minnesota, USA
- Varun Mishra, Northeastern University, USA
- Aske Mottelson, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Monica Perusquia-Hernandez, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
- Manoel Horta Ribeiro, EPFL, Switzerland
- Daniel Rough, University of Dundee, UK
- Ahmed Sabbir Arif, University of California, Merced, USA
- Koustuv Saha, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Erin Solovey, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, USA
- Madeleine Steeds, University College Dublin, Ireland
- S. Shyam Sundar, Pennsylvania State University, USA
- Benjamin Tag, Monash University, Australia
- Daricia Wilkinson, Microsoft Research, USA
- Spenceer Williams, University of Washington, USA
- Philipp Wintersberger, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Austria
- Ziang Xiao, Johns Hopkins University, USA
- Ming Yin, Purdue University, USA
- Chao Zhang, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
Contact: people-quant@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Inferring Cognitive Models from Data using Approximate Bayesian Computation
- Explaining the Gap: Visualizing One’s Predictions Improves Recall and Comprehension of Data
- Looking Coordinated: Bidirectional Gaze Mechanisms for Collaborative Interaction with Virtual Characters
- Priming Drivers before Handover in Semi-Autonomous Cars
- Modelling Learning of New Keyboard Layouts
- HARK No More: On the Preregistration of CHI Experiments
- Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines
- Measuring Employment Demand Using Internet Search Data
- Sensing Interruptibility in the Office: A Field Study on the Use of Biometric and Computer Interaction Sensors
- A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers’ Earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk
- Detecting Personality Traits Using Eye-Tracking Data
- Quantitative Measurement of Tool Embodiment for Virtual Reality Input Alternatives
- An Explanation for Fitts’ Law-like Performance in Gaze-Based Selection Tasks Using a Psychophysics Approach
- Developing a Personality Model for Speech-based Conversational Agents Using the Psycholexical Approach
- Heartbeats in the Wild: A Field Study Exploring ECG Biometrics in Everyday Life
- Review of Quantitative Empirical Evaluations of Technology for People with Visual Impairments
- Do Cross-Cultural Differences in Visual Attention Patterns Affect Search Efficiency on Websites?
- Psychometric Properties of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)
- Proxemics for Human-Agent Interaction in Augmented Reality
- Changes in Research Ethics, Openness, and Transparency in Empirical Studies between CHI 2017 and CHI 2022
- iFAD Gestures: Understanding Users’ Gesture Input Performance with Index-Finger Augmentation Devices
- Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views
- Can Voice Assistants Be Microaggressors? Cross-Race Psychological Responses to Failures of Automatic Speech Recognition
- Save A Tree or 6 kg of CO2? Understanding Effective Carbon Footprint Interventions for Eco-Friendly Vehicular Choices
- Bias-Aware Systems: Exploring Indicators for the Occurrences of Cognitive Biases when Facing Different Opinions
- Short-Form Videos Degrade Our Capacity to Retain Intentions: Effect of Context Switching On Prospective Memory
- User Preference and Performance using Tagging and Browsing for Image Labeling
- Fingerhints: Understanding Users’ Perceptions of and Preferences for On-Finger Kinesthetic Notifications
- Inform the uninformed: Improving Online Informed Consent Reading with an AI-Powered Chatbot
Understanding People — Qualitative Methods
Subcommittee Chairs (Qualitative Methods)
- Helena Mentis, University of Maryland, USA
- Joel Fischer, University of Nottingham, UK
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Andriana Boudouraki, University of Nottingham, UK
Associate Chairs
- Konstantin Aal, University of Siegen, Germany
- Fatemeh Alizadeh,University of Siegen, Germany
- Louise Barkhuus, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Tigmanshu Bhatnagar, University College London, UK
- Jacky Bourgeois, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
- Heloisa Candello, IBM Research Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil, Brazil
- Yung-Ju Chang, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
- Juliana Jansen Ferreira, IBM Research, Brazil
- Adriana Alvarado Garcia, IBM Research, USA
- Oliver Haimson, University of Michigan, USA
- Saad Hassan, Tulane University, USA
- Jina Huh-Yoo, Drexel University, USA
- Shagun Jhaver, University of Washington, USA
- Stine S. Johansen, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
- Vaishnav Kameswaran, University of Michigan, USA
- Agnieszka Kitkowska, Jönköping University, Sweden
- Lindah Kotut, University of Washington, USA
- Minha Lee, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
- Andreas Liesenfeld, Radboud University Nijmegen, NL
- Megh Marathe, Michigan State University, USA
- Maria Matsangidou, CYENS Centre of Excellence, Cyprus
- Nora McDonald, George Mason University, USA
- Reza Hadi Mogavi, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Christine Murad, University of Toronto, Canada
- Paul Parsons, Purdue University, USA
- Hannah Pelikan, University of Linköping, Sweden
- Hawra Rabaan, University of Maryland, USA
- Gisela Reyes-Cruz, University of Nottingham, UK
- Mohammad Rashidujjaman Rifat, University of Toronto, Canada
- John Rooksby, Northumbria University, UK
- Sabirat Rubya, Marquette University, USA
- Pejman Saeghe, University of Glasgow, UK
- Eike Schneiders, University of Nottingham, UK
- Xinhuan Shu, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Jaisie Sin, University of Toronto, Canada
- Velvet Spors, Tampere University, Finland
- Sharifa Sultana, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA
- Hanuma Teja Maddali, University of Maryland, USA
- Hüseyin Uğur Genç, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
- Sarah Theres Völkel, Google, Germany
- Mark Warner, University College London, UK
Contact: people-qual@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- “That Courage to Encourage”: Participation and Aspirations in Chat-based Peer Support for Youth Living with HIV
- More Kawaii Than a Real-Person Live Streamer: Understanding How the Otaku Community Engages with and Perceives Virtual YouTubers
- Religion and Women’s Intimate Health: Towards an Inclusive Approach to Healthcare
- Your Money’s No Good Here: The Introduction of Compulsory Cashless Payments on London’s Buses
- I’d Hide You: Performing Live Broadcasting in Public
- Data-in-Place: Thinking through the Relations Between Data and Community
- Sharing Personal Content Online: Exploring Channel Choice and Multi-Channel Behaviors
- Dear Diary: Teens Reflect on Their Weekly Online Risk Experiences
- Reframing Disability as Competency: Unpacking Everyday Technology Practices of People with Visual Impairments
- Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life
Understanding People — Mixed and Alternative Methods
Subcommittee Chairs (Mixed and Alternative Methods)
- Antti Salovaara, Aalto University, Finland
- Steven Dow, University of California, San Diego, USA
Subcommittee Chair Assistants
- Lu Sun, UC San Diego, USA
Associate Chairs
- Mary Jean Amon, University of Central Florida, USA
- Salvatore Andolina, University of Palermo, Italy
- Frank Bentley, Google, USA
- Jacob Biehl, University of Pittsburgh, USA
- Joel Chan, University of Maryland, USA
- Ruijia (Regina) Cheng, Apple/University of Washington, USA
- Sarah Clinch, The University of Manchester, UK
- Enrico Costanza, University College London, UK
- Michael Gilbert, Google, USA
- Mitchell L. Gordon, MIT, USA
- Xinning Gui, Pennsylvania State University, USA
- Nuwan Janaka, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Alexandra Kitson, Simon Fraser University, Canada
- Marina Kogan, University of Utah, USA
- Xingyu Lan, Fudan University, China
- Raina Langevin, University of Washington, USA
- Shaun Lawson, University of Northumbria, UK
- Min Lee, Singapore Management University, Singapore
- Myeong Lee, George Mason University, USA
- Tianyi Li, Purdue University, USA
- Can Liu, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Kurt Luther, Virginia Tech, USA
- Stephen MacNeil, Temple University, USA
- Nikolas Martelaro, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Nicholas Micallef, Swansea University, UK
- Dave Murray-Rust, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
- Minna Pakanen, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Simon Perrault, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore
- Stuart Reeves, University of Nottingham, UK
- Sean Rintel, Microsoft, UK
- Kavous Salehzadeh Niksirat, EPFL / University of Lausanne, Switzerland
- Md. Sami Uddin, University of Regina, Canada
- Samiha Samrose, Stealth Startup, USA
- Valentin Schwind, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Germany
- Miriam Sturdee, University of St. Andrews, UK
- Kami Vaniea, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Markel Vigo, University of Manchester, UK
- Meng Xia, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
- Yu-Chun (Grace) Yen, UC San Diego / National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University (from Feb), USA
Contact: ppeople-mixed@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Understanding Design Tradeoffs for Health Technologies: A Mixed-Methods Approach
- How to Guide Task-oriented Chatbot Users, and When: A Mixed-methods Study of Combinations of Chatbot Guidance Types and Timings
- Navigating Relationships and Boundaries: Concerns around ICT-uptake for Elderly People
- Tech Help Desk: Support for Local Entrepreneurs Addressing the Long Tail of Computing Challenges
- Digital Portraits: Photo-sharing After Domestic Violence
- Consumption experiences in the research process
- Barriers to Online Dementia Information and Mitigation
- Considerations for Implementing Technology to Support Community Radio in Rural Communities
- Feminist Living Labs as Research Infrastructures for HCI: The Case of a Video Game Company
- Understanding Frontline Workers’ and Unhoused Individuals’ Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless Services
- DataHalo: A Customizable Notification Visualization System for Personalized and Longitudinal Interactions
- Stakeholder-Centered AI Design: Co-Designing Worker Tools with Gig Workers through Data Probes
User Experience and Usability
This subcommittee is suitable for papers that extend the knowledge, practices, methods, components, and tools that make technology more useful, usable, and desirable. Successful papers will present results, practical approaches, tools, technologies, and research methods that demonstrably advance our understanding, design, and evaluation of user experience and/or usability. The focus is on usability and user experience of widely used technologies with contributions being judged substantially on the basis of their demonstrable potential for effective reuse and applicability across a range of application domains or across a range of design, research, and user communities.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Stefan Schneegass, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
- Jonna Häkkilä, University of Lapland, Finland
- Andrés Lucero, Aalto University, Finland
- Erin Cherry, OUSD (R&E) TRMC / KBR, USA
Associate Chairs
- Yomna Abdelrahman, University of the Bundeswehr, Germany
- Alex Adams, Georgia institute of Technology: Interactive Computing, institute for Robotics and intelligent machines (IRIM), USA
- Ashley Colley, University of Lapland, Finland
- Mark Colley, Ulm University, Germany
- Florian Daiber, DFKI, Germany
- Tilman Dingler, University of Melbourne, Australia
- Rahul Divekar, Bentley University, United States
- Augusto Esteves, University of Lisbon, Portugal
- Morten Fjeld, Chalmers University, University of Bergen, Sweden
- Carolina Fuentes, Cardiff University, United Kingdom
- Jeremie Garcia, French Civil Aviation University / ENAC, France
- Caglar Genc, Tampere University, Finland
- Jorge Goncalves, University of Melbourne, Australia
- Uwe Grünefeld, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
- Sebastian Günther, Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
- Caroline Harriott, BILL, USA
- Linda Hirsch, Fraunhofer FIT, Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Tobias Höllerer, University of California Santa Barbara, USA
- Armagan Karahanoglu, University of Twente, Netherlands
- Janin Koch, INRIA, France
- Thomas Kosch, HU Berlin, Germany
- Ville Mäkelä, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Florian Mathis, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Andrii Matviienko, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
- Ryan Mckendrick, Northrop Grumman, USA
- Ryan McMahan, University of Central Florida, USA
- Alexander Meschtscherjakov, University of Salzburg, Austria
- Bastian Pfleging, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany
- Claudio Pinhanez, IBM Research, Brazil
- Henning Pohl, Aalborg University, Denmark
- Andreas Riener, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Germany
- Daisuke Sakamoto, Hokkaido University, Japan
- Joongi Shin, Aalto University, Finland
- Vikash Singh, Vanderbilt University, USA
- Markus Tatzgern, Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Austria
- Jerald Thomas, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, USA
- Elizabeth Veinott, Michigan Technological University, USA
- Eduardo Velloso, University of Melbourne, Australia
- Aku Visuri, University of Oulu, Finland
- Phillip Walker, SIFT, USA
- Robin Welsch, Aalto University, Finland
- Sang Won Lee, Virginia Tech, USA
- Yaxing Yao, Virginia Tech, USA
Contact: ux@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Dance and Choreography in HCI: A Two-Decade Retrospective
- Designing Clinical AAC Tablet Applications with Adults who have Mild Intellectual Disabilities
- Breaking The Experience: Effects of Questionnaires in VR User Studies
- A Wee Bit More Interaction: Designing and Evaluating an Overactive Bladder App
- The Effect of Thermal Stimuli on the Emotional Perception of Images
- Understanding the Relationship between Frustration and the Severity of Usability Problems: What can Psychophysiological Data (Not) Tell Us?
- Developing and Validating the User Burden Scale: A Tool for Assessing User Burden in Computing Systems
- Momentary Pleasure or Lasting Meaning? Distinguishing Eudaimonic and Hedonic User Experiences
- VelociTap: Investigating Fast Mobile Text Entry using Sentence-Based Decoding of Touchscreen Keyboard Input Computation of Interface Aesthetics
- Effects of Ad Quality & Content-relevance on Perceived Content Quality
- Mediating Attention for Second Screen Companion Content
- S.O.S.: Does Your Search Engine Results Page (SERP) Need Help?
- Stock Lamp: An Engagement-Versatile Visualization Design
- Panopticon as an eLearning Support Search Tool
- Causing Commotion with a Shape-changing Bench: Experiencing Shape-Changing Interfaces in Use
- Cognitively Inspired Task Design to Improve User Performance on Crowdsourcing Platforms
- Exploring the Usefulness of Finger-Based 3D Gesture Menu Selection
- Investigating the Feasibility of Extracting Tool Demonstrations from In-Situ Video Content
- MinEMail: SMS Alert System for Managing Critical Emails
- Show me the Invisible: Visualizing Hidden Content
- A Multi-Site Field Study of Crowdsourced Contextual Help: Usage and Perspectives of End-Users and Software Teams
- Emotions, Experiences and Usability in Real-Life Mobile Phone Use
- I Am The Passenger: How Sickness Caused By In-Car VR HMD Use Is Influenced by Visual Conveyances Of Motion
- Supporting the Use of User Generated Content in Journalistic Practice
- Increasing Users’ Confidence in Uncertain Data by Aggregating Data from Multiple Sources
- Understanding Public Evaluation: Quantifying Experimenter Intervention
Visualization
The Visualization subcommittee welcomes papers from all areas of data visualization and visual analytics. This includes, but is not limited to, new visualization or interaction techniques/systems/technologies, evaluations of existing or new visualization systems and techniques, groundwork identifying important theories or insights for the community, and lessons learned from real-world designs and deployments. Submissions will be judged based on the contribution they make to visualization as well as their impact on HCI. For example, papers that focus on technical contributions need to show how these relate to humans and user experience.
Subcommittee Chairs
- Miriah Meyer, Linköping University, Sweden
- Adam Perer, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Associate Chairs
- Eytan Adar, University of Michigan, USA
- Danielle Albers Szafir, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
- Rita Borgo, King’s College London, UK
- Matthew Brehmer, Tableau Research, USA
- Christopher Bryan, Arizona State University, USA
- Nan Cao, Tongji University, China
- Zhutian Chen, Harvard University & University of Minnesota, USA
- Anamaria Crisan, Tableau Research, USA
- Tim Dwyer, Monash University, Australia
- Niklas Elmqvist, Aarhus University, Denmark
- Alex Endert, Georgia Tech, USA
- Jeffrey Heer, University of Washington, USA
- Nam Wook Kim, Boston College, USA
- Yea-Seul Kim, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
- Quan Li, ShanghaiTech University, China
- Zhicheng Liu, University of Maryland College Park, USA
- Narges Mahyar, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
- Justin Matejka, Autodesk Research, Canada
- Carolina Nobre, University of Toronto, Canada
- Charles Perin, University of Victoria, Canada
- Arnaud Prouzeau, Centre Inria de l’Université de Bordeaux, France
- Kim Sauvé, University of Bath, UK
- Michael Sedlmair, University of Stuttgart, Germany
- Jinwook Seo, Seoul National University, South Korea
- Nicole Sultanum, Tableau Research, USA
- Theophanis Tsandilas, Université Paris-Saclay, Inria, France
- Cagatay Turkay, University of Warwick, UK
- Emily Wall, Emory University, USA
- Aoyu Wu, Harvard University, USA
- Fumeng Yang, Northwestern University, USA
- Yalong Yang, Georgia Tech, USA
- Jian Zhao, University of Waterloo, Canada
Contact: vis@chi2024.acm.org
Example Papers
- Understanding Data Accessibility for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
- Data@Hand: Fostering Visual Exploration of Personal Data on Smartphones Leveraging Speech and Touch Interaction
- Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online
- Techniques for Flexible Responsive Visualization Design
- InChorus: Designing Consistent Multimodal Interactions for Data Visualization on Tablet Devices
- A Probabilistic Grammar of Graphics
- Data is Personal: Attitudes and Perceptions of Data Visualization in Rural Pennsylvania
- ActiveInk: (Th)Inking with Data
- Ethical Dimensions of Visualization Research
- Data Illustrator: Augmenting Vector Design Tools with Lazy Data Binding for Expressive Visualization Authoring
- When David Meets Goliath: Combining Smartwatches with a Large Vertical Display for Visual Data Exploration
- Uncertainty Displays Using Quantile Dotplots or CDFs Improve Transit Decision-Making
- Explaining the Gap: Visualizing One’s Predictions Improves Recall and Comprehension of Data
- GraphScape: A Model for Automated Reasoning about Visualization Similarity and Sequencing
- Visualization Literacy at Elementary School
- Towards Understanding Human Similarity Perception in the Analysis of Large Sets of Scatter Plots
- Egocentric Analysis of Dynamic Networks with EgoLines
- Investigating the Direct Manipulation of Ranking Tables for Time Navigation
- Exploring Interactions with Physically Dynamic Bar Charts
- Monadic Exploration: Seeing the Whole Through Its Parts
- Weighted Graph Comparison Techniques for Brain Connectivity Analysis
- Wrangler: Interactive Visual Specification of Data Transformation Scripts
- Sizing the Horizon: The Effects of Chart Size and Layering on the Graphical Perception of Time Series Visualizations